Science Caturday: SfN = Society for Naughtykitties

This week, lots of smart peeps (about 30,000 of them) are in San Diego for Neuroscience 2013, The annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience. Our science kitty decided to be very naughty and break the embargo on one of this year’s hottest developments in neuroscience.

noooo

Sorry, Dr. Muffins. No tuna for embargo-busting kitties!

photo via Cheezburger.com

Science Caturday: Or is it Punday?

A bad pun (and really, is there any other kind?) is built right into Science Caturday. You might say it’s in its DNA…..

badpun1

And since two bad puns are better than one….

badpun2

photos via Cheezburger.com

Science Caturday: The Search for Bigfoot

bigfoot-yeti-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-hoo-is-

Late last year, a group of scientists led by Dr. Melba Ketchum announced that they had sequenced the genome of a bigfoot, (also known as sasquatch or yeti), a furry, mountain-dwelling creature generally considered mythical. Not surprisingly, most mainstream scientists questioned Ketchum’s paper on the “Bigfoot Genome”, which, after being rejected by all the peer reviewed journals in the field, was published in De Novo, a brand-new journal which has published nothing else since.  The paper asserts that bigfeet are hybrids, the product of humans interbreeding with a still unknown species of hominin.

aaargh

A few months after the findings were released, John Timmer, the science editor of Ars Technica, wrote an article which systematically reviewed and explained the weaknesses in Ketchum’s paper.  Timmer spoke extensively with Ketchum, who, while admitting that some of her data didn’t fit a standard scientific model, claimed that she was confident in her knowledge that bigfeet exist – because she’s seen them.  Apparently they are “very fast” and curious about people. (Have I convinced you to read this article yet? You really should.)

catsquatch

Now a British scientist has come forward with more exciting news for cryptozoology fans.  Oxford University geneticist Bryan Sykes recently reported the findings of a project which tested hair and tissue samples that people claimed belonged to bigfeet, yetis or sasquatches. According to Sykes, DNA from two hair samples from the Himalayas matched the genetic signature of an ancient polar bear jawbone that was found in the Norwegian Arctic in 2004.  Although intrigued by the possibilities, most scientists in the field are withholding judgment until Sykes’ data are published and subject to peer review.

refuses

So maybe bigfeet are the descendants of prehistoric polar bears. Or maybe they’re half-human. Or maybe, just maybe, they’re cats. Nobody has tested the DNA yet, but the visual evidence is strong.

All photos via Cheezburger.com

Science Caturday: For the Women of ScienceOnline

smalleycat

It’s been a traumatic and bruising week for the science blogosphere, particularly for the ScienceOnline community (if you don’t know why, please come back next week for a normal, funny Science Caturday).  This one is for the women of ScienceOnline, you wonderful, smart, hardworking, funny, talented, kind, empathetic and supportive group. You deserve to be treated like the dedicated professionals you are. I stand with you. Whenever possible, I drink with you and eat cake with you.  I know it’s not much, but this cat’s for you.

Science Caturday: Antarcticat

penguincat

Bad news kept coming for US scientists this week, as the National Science Foundation announced that they would cancel the U.S. Antarctic research program for this year because of the ongoing government shutdown.  The cancellation will directly affect over 50 scientists, grad students and support staff, and Stanley, a cat conducting important research on Antarctica’s penguins.  Sorry, buddy.