Taxpayers fund a ton of government research — and the results can get stuck behind a paywall that tops $20,000. Should they be able to see them without paying a second time around?
It sounds like a reasonable argument, but scientific journals make the counterargument that they add essential value to published research via their editorial and publication process, and thus they need subscription fees to stay in business.
The red herring in all of this is that the best argument for open access is that the public pays for research and thus deserves access. Continue reading “Mandating open access science publishing”

