In math and physics we have the arXiv, but nobody referees those papers. In biology and medicine, a board called the Faculty of 1000 chooses and evaluates the best papers, but there’s no archive: they get those papers from traditional journals.
Whoops—never mind! That was yesterday. Now the Faculty of 1000 has started an archive!
• Rebecca Lawrence, F1000 Research – join us and shape the future of scholarly communication, F1000, 30 January 2012.
I’m all for giving this a try, but I still have a hard time seeing how some type of arXiv thing would work in the life sciences, simply because the life sciences are so damn big. Life scientists in academic research make up more than one third of all academic scientists. There are more than twice as many academic life scientists as physical scientists, and more life scientists than all academic physicists, mathematicians, computer scientists, chemists, and earth scientists combined. As far as I can tell by my anecdotal observations, life scientists publish many short papers, as opposed to fewer and longer papers, which is the norm in other fields.
The Finch and Pea 