ENCODE is devouring the rest of biomedical science

A new NIH RFA:

PsychENCODE: Identification and Characterization of Non-coding Functional Elements in the Brain, and their Role in the Development of Mental Disorders (R01)

The Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) project, by systematically cataloging transcribed regions, transcription factor binding sites, and chromatin structure, has recently found that a larger fraction of the human genome may be functional than was previously appreciated. However, our understanding of the role of these functional genomic elements in neurodevelopment and mental disorders is at an early stage. This funding opportunity will support studies that identify non-coding functional genomic elements and elucidate their role in the etiology of mental disorders.

Suddenly, the ENOCDE model is now the way to do science. It’s hard to disagree with Dan Graur on what the consequences are:

The big difference between the Human Genome Project and ENCODE is that the former produced data that are undisputedly true and useful (a C is a C is a C is a C). The ENCODE project is a collection of zillions of experiments, each employing a certain cell line, a certain set of temperatures, a certain pH, and many other particular experimental conditions. The results are not as clear as the sequence CTTGACTTAT. So, while all the world is interested in human genome sequences, and the sequences are an objective set of data (albeit not an errorless one), the ENCODE data may be useful for some and useless for others. I, for one, do not regard HeLa cells as human. I don’t think we can learn anything “human” from these cells or any other malignant cell lines…

The funding of ENCODE has cost many small-science scientists their scientific livelihood. Thus, many people outside ENCODE may well use the ENCODE data in the future simply because they have no money to do the experiments they wanted to do in the first place.

American science has been great for many years because it allowed small science and individual scientists to flourish. Now, it allows a few people who have learned how to con the system to flourish (usually if they manage to gather enough technicians to do their bidding).

Not only are the experiments being done in meaningless cell lines, the results are often incredibly sloppy. Since when has a correlation of 0.36 between experimental replicates become acceptable?

At some point, some people decided that doing ENCODE was a good idea. Now that the data is available, I will use it and derive some benefit from it. It is not clear to me, however, that this has been a net benefit for biomedical science. And seeing the ENCODE model set in as permanent, long-term model for how to do science is incredibly infuriating and disappointing for someone working out of a small lab, trying to build a career in what is becoming an increasingly dysfunctional field, in spite of the recent spectacular advances in technology.

About these ads

4 responses to “ENCODE is devouring the rest of biomedical science

  1. In fairness, I should note that this RFA is an R01, and thus the funding mechanism is not exactly following the big consortium ENCODE model. But the framing of the question is telling enough.

  2. It is terrifying that the NIH RFA is using the “almost everything is functional” claim as a supporting point for it’s effort. Repeating that claim with any seriousness or without a long list of caveats is a strong sign you don’t know what you are talking about. It appears the people controlling the funding don’t know what they are talking about.

    • Yeah, I was ready to scream after reading the very first sentence, but didn’t want to freak out those around me.

      • I think you could have explained it pretty easily. This does seem like a good reason to freak people out.

        Mike: “AHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!”
        People: “Mike, what’s wrong!?”
        Mike: “The NIH is basing funding proposals on the ENCODE ‘junk DNA’ result.”
        People: “AHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s